English
PlatformFeaturesHow it worksPricingFree auditBook demoStart with Advisionr
Knowledge Base / Optimisations
Optimisations8–12 min read

Keywords, search terms and negative keywords

How Advisionr analyses wasted search terms, new keyword opportunities, negative keywords and conflicts.

What you will know after this article
  • Make sure primary conversions represent real business outcomes such as purchases or qualified leads.
  • Allow synchronisation to finish before judging new recommendations.
  • Always read the campaign and account context instead of acting on the title alone.
  • Change one decisive factor at a time when possible and let the measurement period finish.

Why this matters

In Advisionr this feature is part of a wider decision process. Current Google Ads data, account settings, previous changes and measured outcomes are evaluated together. The same feature can therefore lead to a different recommendation in two accounts, which is exactly what you want from account-specific optimisation.

For the best result, first make sure synced data is current and that your primary conversions represent real business value. Then use Advisionr’s explanation to understand why a recommendation exists. A change is only truly useful when you can also measure afterwards whether it improved the result.

How to get the best result

Advisionr performs best when data, goals and responsibilities are clear. Use this working method to improve the quality of analyses and decisions.

  • Make sure primary conversions represent real business outcomes such as purchases or qualified leads.
  • Allow synchronisation to finish before judging new recommendations.
  • Always read the campaign and account context instead of acting on the title alone.
  • Change one decisive factor at a time when possible and let the measurement period finish.
  • Only broaden AutoPilot after checking goals, budgets and allowed action types.
  • Review History regularly to see both executed and deliberately blocked actions.

Common mistakes

  • Judging an optimisation on one day or one metric without context.
  • Making many changes close together and losing causal clarity.
  • Opening AutoPilot limits before conversion tracking and budget guardrails are verified.
  • Expecting every analysis to become a One-Click action even when evidence is insufficient.
  • Confusing an automatically closed proposal with an executed Google Ads change.

Frequently asked questions

How often should I review {title}?

A weekly review is a good minimum for active accounts. Review more often during major changes, but avoid reacting daily to normal volatility.

Why can Advisionr analyse something without creating an action?

Analysis and execution are deliberately separate. The opportunity may lack volume, be in an active measurement window, lack a safe executor or fail confidence and risk requirements.

Can Full AutoPilot always execute this automatically?

Only when the action type is enabled and every fixed safety check passes. Full AutoPilot does not mean every possible change is executed blindly.

← Back to all topics